The
“Potter’s Oracle” illustrates the Egyptian’s strong xenophobic feelings of the
second century BC throughout its text.
It is a document that is rife with allegory, alliteration, and imagery
focusing on the downtrodden and destructive state of Egypt, and pointing the blame at
the Typhonians[1]. It is through this viewpoint that the oracle
brings out the themes of national resistance to foreign domination to the
forefront.
In
the oracle, there is a reference made to “the river will flow without enough
water”[2]. It can be surmised that this river would be
the Nile, the life-blood of Egypt
without which the Egyptians would not be able to live. It says that the land will be inflamed
against nature because of the lack of water.
This could be understood as a prediction that the Nile
will have a period of drought or that it’s annual flooding will not be as
substantial as usual. The Potter,
however, links this event to the fact that the Typhonians[3]
are in power and that their impurity is the cause of this disaster.
The
reference to girdlewearers in the Potters oracle was explained by O’Connell to
be translated from the Greek word zonophoroi.
She said that this word has caused problems among scholars, but that it
has been translated to refer specifically to Assyrians, Persians and
Greeks. This is due to the fact that the
daggers worn in the girdle by people such as the Persians of this time were
quite peculiar to the Egyptians as they did not have them. Because of the invasions that were ongoing
into Egypt by these
countries at this time, eventually the term ‘girdlewearer’ became synonymous
with Sethian and Typhonian for a xenophobic hatred of those that would try to
posses Egypt,
including the Greeks[4].
The
social aspect of life in Egypt
at this time is not pleasant either. The
Potter tells of how the farmers are not able to plant all of their crops, and
that of the crops that do grow, they are either taxed or stolen due to the
people of Egypt starving[5]. Further to the crop problems, the Potter goes
on to say that there will be civil unrest causing brother to kill brother,
husbands to kill wives, and that these will continue until Hephaistos returns
to the city and the girdlewearers destroy themselves.
When
the oracle makes reference to Agathos Daimon abandoning the “city that is to be
built” and entering Memphis,
it states that this will be at the end of the evils during autumn[6]. The city that is to be built is Alexandria, a foreign capital and as such would stand for
all things not of Egypt
that a true Egyptian would find loathsome and undesirable in their xenophobic
state. Further, the religious icons and
statues would have been transferred to Alexandria
from the other capital centres, such as Memphis,
when it was built. This is done by
invaders to symbolise the removal of power from that city and people and thus
make the conquered feel as though they have lost their divine protection[7]. Usually these were the statues and objects
that were used in some of the ritualistic acts of worshipping the patron god,
and his image in the form of the statues represented his contact with his
people.
Alexandria is also to be brought back down to
its original low state of a fishing village from that of the capital according
to the line “the city by the sea will become a drying place for fishermen
because Agathos Daimon and Knephis will have gone to Memphis”[8]. According to an explanation by O’Connell, Alexandria was founded on the fishing village of Rhacotis
and the statement that Alexandria
will go back to being just the fishing village is symbolic of it loosing its
importance[9]. This is significant in that Alexandria
was a capital founded by foreigners, and it losing its importance would be seen
as Egypt gaining control of
itself again with the old capital of Memphis. Further, Agathos Daimon was the patron spirit
of Alexandria
from the time that Alexander himself was examining the future city site. At this time, a great snake came and was
killed. This snake evidently impressed
Alexander enough that he set up a hero shrine to it in Alexandria and named it Agathos Daimon, and
there were many small harmless snakes that were kept by the local people in
honour of this great snake[10]. Thus, the statement in the oracle that
Agathos Daimon would leave Alexandria and go to Memphis is symbolic of the
people of Egypt taking the god of the foreigners back to their capital, just as
the Typhonians had take the Egyptian gods to Alexandria as was previously
stated.
There
can be seen some similarities between the writing of the “Potter’s Oracle” and
the events of the Maccabean revolt. The
Maccabeans were opposed to the Roman rule over Jerusalem and revolted in kind. Eventually, they were able to retake the
temple and forced Antiochus to rescind the religious reforms that he had placed
on non-Hellenistic religions. Both the
Maccabean people and the Egyptians were not happy to be ruled over by
foreigners, and it might be surmised that just as the Maccabeans revolted, the
Egyptians used the “Potter’s Oracle” as a propaganda against the Typhonians
rule, hoping that it would lead to Egypt reclaiming itself from the
girdlewearers.
Bibliography
Kerkeslager, A. (1998).
The Apology of the Potter: A
Translation of the Potter’s Oracle.
‘Jerusalem
Studies in Egyptology’, p. 67-79
O’Connell, B. (1983).
The Potter’s Oracle. ‘Ancient Society Resources for Teachers’,
13:5, p. 151-160.
Rainer Papyrus, Potter’s Oracle. HST225
Alexander and the Hellenistic Age Lecture notes, Lecture 23, Macquarie University
[1] Rainer
Papyrus, Lecture 23 notes
[2] Ibid
[3]
Typhonians is a reference to the foreign rules of Egypt, possibly the Greeks as
stated by Kerkeslager, p. 68
[4]
O’Connell Potter’s Oracle, p. 155
[5] Rainer
Papyrus, Lecture 23 notes
[6] Ibid
[7]
O’Connell Potter’s Oracle, p. 156
[8] Rainer
Papyrus, Lecture 23 notes
[9]
O’Connell Potter’s Oracle, p. 156
[10] Lecture
23 notes citing Pseudo-Callisthenes 32.10-13
No comments:
Post a Comment